Aleister Crowley and the Star


The story goes that Crowley was in contact with an extra-dimensional entity (Aiwaz), who told him, in the course of things, "All these old letters of my Book are aright; but tzaddi is not the Star." Crowley took this to mean that the Star trump is not in its correct place, and thus does not correspond to the Hebrew letter Tsadde.

The real problem, of course, was with the seven doubles, and the only blind among the zodiacal signs, the obvious Strength-Justice reversal, had already been remedied by Mathers and the Golden Dawn. The Emperor and the Star corresponding to the Hebrew letters Hay (Aries) and Tsadde (Aquarius) are as natural and correct as Strength and Justice corresponding to Tayt (Leo) and Lammed (Libra).

Crowley's me-tooism seems a little transparent and he really created a problem where there was none by ignoring the obvious zodiacal symbolism of the Emperor (initiator of the zodiac, Hay/Life formative of Aries) and Tsadde (water-bearer, formative of the feminine structuralizing Aquarius).

Better to have left well-enough alone. Spirits are notorious for speaking in a way that is true but bound to be misunderstood by the psyche of the receiver.

Tsadde is not the Star because Tsadde is the woman, feminine structualizing energy in a dual flow.

The Star is a symbol of the Aquarian transfiguration of femininity, where womanhood is liberated and perfected. This was, perhaps, a little too much for Crowley's Victorian mind, which resisted an ironic prophecy of the destruction of patriarchal structures to come.

Tsadde (Hebrew, 90) is the feminine structuralizing energy of Tayt (Strength) projected into actuality, where it can ultimately find perfection in its own exaltation as Tsadde in final-letter (Hebrew, 900).

Suares emphasizes that the key to human evolution is in the development and transformation of the feminine in the psyches of both sexes. This transformation has an effect on personal, interpersonal and societal relationships and is based on dissolving the obsolete structures that hinder human equality and development. Saturn (Shabatai) is dead (Mot) in Aquarius (Deli).

Women will play primary roles in the social and politcal structures of the next (Aquarian) millenium, or life (Hhaim) won't be free for its realization in Capricorn (Ghedi) two thousand years from now.

Here's an example of the muddle:

      The problem with 'VIII' is that no one can decide, with ultimate authority, what it's supposed to be. Some people say 'VIII' should be 'Strength' while others say 'Justice' (and thus these two cards are locked in a struggle over the number placements 'VIII' and 'XI'). At the same time, and to muddy things more, there is the whole problem introduced by Aleister Crowley, in his influential 'Thoth' deck, who exchanged the attributions (the correspondences between Tarot trumps and paths on the kabbalistic Tree of Life) of IV-Emperor (yes, we skipped that problem) and XVII-Star. Most people, who are not strict adherents to Crowley's Thelemic system, have not followed nor concerned themselves much with the latter change, but many still fight over the VIII-XI controversy. Based on purely astrological considerations the better choice seems to be Strength in 'VIII' and Justice in 'XI'. But there's more to it than that -- there almost always is in Tarot. However, that's something you can ask about on alt.tarot.

      Tarot Faq


"VIII", however, is neither Strength nor Justice, being really Hhayt, 8, the Chariot. When the natural bond of the letter-numbers of the Hebrew alphabet with both quality and quantity (Aleph=1, Bayt=2, Ghimmel=3 ... Hhayt=8) is broken, things quickly fall apart. The disjunction is entirely an invention of the European mind -- no one thinking in Hebrew would dream of setting Aleph = Zero.

When non-Hebrew-literate "initiates" get involved with the Tarot:

      One reason reason for this is that the Thoth deck connects the letter Tzaddi with the Emperor, while the letter He gets attached to the Star. Some decks use it the other way round, but Aleister Crowley thought that Tzaddi just wouldn't feel right with the Star.      

"Feel right." Ok.

More on
Aleister Crowley
The Great Beast
Crowley and Jung: The Guru/Messiah Syndrome
Crowley: prophet of a new aeon or era for mankind
and the Star:
The Extention of Nuit
"These"
Tzaddi is not the Star
The Path of The Emperor
Links:
Magical Systems

Review of Magick : Liber Aba : Book 4

This book is certainly a classic of sorts; Crowley has spawned a stagnant pond full of imitators, but none will ever match his wit, intelligence, originality and genius for prose writing. By all means, if you're someone who needs a self-image as a person who is seeking enlightenment of some kind but wants to look cool and dangerous doing it, buy this inspired drivel and convince yourself it works, assuming you're one of the few actually dull enough to read it all. Or to try and carry any of this stuff out. The book's primary purpose, of course, is to look good on your bookshelf and impress your friends, if you have any, with what amazing arcane knowledge you have. And yes, you might even get high and play these idiotic Golden Dawn dress-up games and convince yourself you're actually accomplishing something. Of course, if your're interested in real transformation, not drugs, buggery and egomaniacal pretense--Crowley's, and most of his admirers', reasons for existence--then for god's sake stop seeking anything and spend the money you could waste on this thing on some books on Zen or Krishnamurti (yes, the one the arch-jealous Crowley hurled racist insults at) when you need to exercise the verbal parts of your brain. Anyway, this volume will look even more cool and mysterious if you let it gather some dust.

Reviewer: A reader from TN USA